plays with or without not only in the era of AIDS play a role. Also in labor with or without making a huge difference. It might say that the employer has it better as the relevant-clichéd male Thailand Tourist, workers with power. Without
is bad. Since there are no compulsory redundancies six-digit severance pay, no transfer company, possibilities of an enforceable right of participation. And then the Economic Committee ...
Many employers is not even the Consumer Protection Act applies. At 58 because of company restructuring is simply the end. Where: grounds, the employer is not even have simply tired.
Those are differences, which has a 30 years in office made it very easy, an additional pension, and goes - after a life of good content - with 60 in a moving early retirement. The other has malocht 30 years in a draughty hall, his master craftsmen kept the faith and get after a long illness aged 60 just nothing more. Some unemployment benefits, then on your savings (Alg II is not yes).
Since then I find the tracking device on company cars of the Works in relation not so wild. One has to not do everything and then complain even if you get caught. For example, doctoral thesis copy and paste in summa cum laude, there will also be slaughtered (possibly because one or the other hoped it could do with more people with momentum going into politics). Without that interested the right of privacy, simply because they have exaggerated, and his ambition is no longer in control - but that's obviously a completely different topic. Or not?
0 comments:
Post a Comment